Originally Posted by WitchdoctorDan (Post 276048)

To me, MOH is just what it always has been: a rampant attempt to steal Call of Duty's thunder. Instead of sticking to the WWII shooter market (now wide open since CoD left it and Brothers in Arms is gone) and showing that they aren't copycats; they went to modern times. Who else made that change, I wonder? Oh yeah, CALL OF DUTY DID. The graphics are worse, the Multi-Player is worse, everything is worse than the game they tried to copy. Strange. The game does make you more human, but it is not too good for my tastes. There are TOO MANY CHARACTERS in campaign, for one. The Multiplayer is alright, just a copycat version of CoD though. And, the game has lacking graphics. They make the game look 3 years old. There are some good points, like more believability and realism, but failed at most. Not my cup of tea...

Originally Posted by Swash (Post 276076)

Actually they're not copying anyone, because if you look at COD: Black Ops mainly every feature is taken from either MW2 or Halo: Reach so don't even say they're stealing from them. Also they haven't always been copying them because the first MoH was released before COD was even thought of. Also the reason for the Graphics is because they used the Same Engine Bad Company 2 used, and don't say they stole that too because DICE made both Bad Company and MoH's Multiplayer. The only thing I find wrong with the Multiplayer is the constant sniping. If they would limit the sniping or Nerf it then the Multiplayer would become much better.

Originally Posted by WitchdoctorDan (Post 276427)

Yes, CoD and Reach (Especially Reach...) are also huge copycats. And what I mean by "Stealing CoDs thunder" is that; since CoD1 they haven't been very original. Though CoD copied something, then MoH copied them. BEFORE CoD came out, it was a very original game. Jeez, why so defensive?...