I ban Andy, because my ban was not a fail. It was art.

I ban DP because this is the ban game, not an art gallery.

I ban Andy because if you look real closely, the ban game is in fact withholding the same amount of beauty as an art gallery. However some of the "display" just doesn't seem to fit.

I ban Skippy because it may contain art, but it's not a gallery. That is also just your opinion, mine differs.

I ban AS for not knowing that banning is an art.

I ban TSC because I just said its not a gallery, not that it isn't art.

I ban AS for being wronger than he usually is.

I ban TSC because:
1.Wronger isn't a word.
2.You didn't point out how I'm wrong.
3.Thats your opinion that I'm wrong, just an opinion.

I ban AS because Wronger is indeed a word. It's a derivative of wrong. Like you.

I ban TSC because 'Wronger' is in no way a word *cough*dictionary*cough*, and you didn't combat my other points.

I ban Andy because those are "points" are self-destructive and don't even need to be combated.

I ban Skippy because they aren't sef-destructive (when do you not point out a wrong thing? When it's not there), and all points need to be combated.

I ban Andy because that's a terrible excuse for having nothing better to say.

I ban Skippy because the above points aren't terrible excuses at all, in-fact what you said could be called the exact same thing.

I ban Andy because while it is true that my above points aren't terrible excuses, this clerification is only required for viewing once. Of course since earlier you said you don't like to look at other peoples bans, 'tis perfectly reasonable to guess that you didn't understand it in the first place.