Quote:
Originally Posted by muffin pirate
Why does everyone care about graphics? I mean where I came from, my psp to be exact, we had no RC-XDs and UAVs. No, we had a little tiny area map and we had to go in and hunt them down. Onto the graphics... I mean, we had enough graphics to where you could see their face, and thats about it. I mean in most levels you could always see this giant blob of pixels. We didn't have blood and all these cool looking explosions. We had a puff of smoke and the a crack. That was a lethal Grenade. Even when we satchled a car or something it was a crack and a puff of smoke. Back to BO. I don't see what the difference graphics does to a game. I admit this is my first CoD game, but still, what is the difference? So what, this looks like MW2. I mean, would you want a cool looking game but bad story line? I don't know why I keep rambling on and on, but I guess my point is to always appreciate something, for when it is gone, it is gone for good...
|
Graphics don't define a game, but they do help to make it better. If I could get a copy of Legend of Zelda: Ocarina of Time with COD level graphics then I wouldn't hesitate to get it. Also the main reason we're complaining about BO's graphics, is because they've used the same engine since COD 4, and that was 4 COD games ago.