I'm just saying some of these arguements may disprove themselves. The whole realms thing doesn't have any basis on anything we can observe. We can think about it, and theorize it, but there's no possible way to ever experience it yourself. Time is something you can experience. Not nescisarrily as a constant force on your own consciousness, but as an effective drive that shows its way through other things.
Let me ask you this: If there were no humans, would there be time? If there would be no way to experience it, would it exist? If the whole universe was just filled with matter and energy, would any science exist? No, everything would run on itself, with nobody to observe. Science is basically the study of probability; being able to tell what should happen through observable evidence.
This is one of the reasons the whole realm thing might deduct itself. If there were no one around to experience such a thing, could it exist? Could the field fluctuations and dark matter in this universe have come from another? Nobody can really give proof for either arguements against all this. No, nothing can really be proved by science, it merely shows possible directions followed by the universe we live in.
Do ideas exist? Do laws exist? We can't touch them, observe them, so how do we know? Well we simply use these things to view the world around us. Also, I have nothing against your beliefs; if its what you think about the universe, good for you. But I would just like to show you that those ideas existed long after the universe was created. If there was nobody to think up such a thing, would it exist?
Oh, and do realize I'm possibly the biggest jerk you're likely to find on the forums; comments about other people's intellegence are all too commonly used by me.
