|
My opinion is that, if you take a flower bud and watch it eventually blossom, the unit of (there's no other way to describe it) time between those two points could be classed as time from anyone's point of view, as the moment we set the flower down onto the ground will not be the same as the moment we see the flower blossom, if you understand. I suppose anything could describe it, but time is the name it's given.
On the other hand, there may be no such thing as time, like you suggest, and the world is just moving and growing of its own accord. We could say that instead of saying that things decay over 'time'. I've never thought about time this way, but I think I could safely say that with deep thoughts like these, there is a chance that someone, somewhere, will learn the secret of time.
Apologies if I'm a little behind in the conversation, because I only read the first post and a few other ones that caught my eye as I scrolled through the thread.
|