Pirate Names - Can't figure Disney out

[Achilles]

Well,.. not to simplify the frustrations,.. for I can certainly understand the disappointment. The consistency of such details needs to come into view.

For the record, Test is a different division and Office all together.
What you will find in administration on Test is completely different from Open administration. Most likely, that is why one allows particular options and another may not… I am hopeful the new content on the way will overshadow your frustrations and perhaps cause them to disappear all together!

Best Regards,

-Achilles


( *** = ..hehe Edward... now you comment on the content ?

[Aliese]

Resubmitting names can work. I've done it on Open with Piper Too, and on Test with Sawyer. Now, don't ask me why they denied them at all (Sawyer was denied twice before being accepted...), but in any case, it can work.

If you're trying to get a name through that's iffy for some reason, though...I wouldn't necessarily push it.

[whiterice]

Originally Posted by Aliese

If you're trying to get a name through that's iffy for some reason, though...I wouldn't necessarily push it.

Agreed. It can be taken away if reported.

[Edward Edgemenace]

Originally Posted by Achilles

hehe Edward... now you comment on the content?

Yes, I've acknowledged that my focus on fixing glitches, is not as popular as the general desire for the next story chapter. Not sure what that has to do with this topic. In my view, it is a glitch, that they don't give a reason for a "bad" name. How can the pirate (or rather, the person behind the pirate) correct their mistake, if they don't know what it was they did wrong, with their tentative name submission?

On TEST, every name rejection should be countered with a report, pointing out that the rejection message does not say specifically why the name was rejected. But I understand people's reluctance to do that...the people reading the reports are probably the same people approving the names.