Its the little things that count.

[Swash]

Originally Posted by ex8404

The better the graphic the better the game? Nonsense. For a while there, PS3 games were terrible. Looked great but had terrible game play.

Along comes a silly little thing like the Wii and Sony is back pedaling like crazy. To the point of copying the Wii-Mote. Wii outsold X-Box and PS3 combined. Didn't last but it forced Sony to look at game play first and graphics later.

And Animal Crossing has been getting great reviews since it was first released. IGN gave it an Outstanding. Your friends sitting around and saying "Dude, this game sux" is NOT a review.



A lesson for you. Add great graphics, swords and grenades and cannons and guns and you will get an M rating. Period. There is no blood on POTCO for a reason. No one really dies for a reason. Everyone gets knocked out and everyone goes to jail and POTCO gets a 10+ even though playing poker should get it a T for teen.

If the problem with POTCO is graphics then play Modern Warfare. But if the real problem is that you don't realize that this is a kid's game then I am not sure what to say.

The truth is that POTCO is a neat idea that will NEVER be fully realized. It is a movie tie-in to a series of movies that the average movie goer has already forgotten about. Disney is a huge company and this little corner of the big picture is meaningless to Disney Executives.

I, for one, am happy to have anything at all...

You fail to realize that I said nothing about adding in swords in guns. You quoted me on games not being rated on graphics and took it upon yourself to add something in so you could be right. Games are not rated on JUST their graphics.

Secondly the Wii outsold the Xbox and PS3 because it was a family oriented system. Unlike the PS3 and the Xbox it is far from being a console for real gamers, Call of Duty is like the only game for real gamers on there. And also I think the WII has great graphics, but un-realistic. And also notice how the Game of the Year last year was a PS3 game and critics are saying that the Game of 2010 is an Xbox game.

Lastly, I back up my argument of Disney having no excuse for taking so long on content with another example. Fallout 3 on PC was a great game and the Developers released an editing pack for it. Turns out the average person took maybe 5 hours from their day and made content better than the people who were PAYED to MAKE the game.

[ex8404]

Originally Posted by Swash

You fail to realize that I said nothing about adding in swords in guns. You quoted me on games not being rated on graphics and took it upon yourself to add something in so you could be right. Games are not rated on JUST their graphics.

Never said they were. I merely added to the conversation by pointing out that better graphics means more realistic depictions of violence. And you cannot deny the existence of "swords in (and?) guns" in this game. Therefore, to say that better graphics won't lead to better looking weapons and, as a result, better kill shots is just wrong. Because if you give a mouse better graphics, he's going to want blood.

Originally Posted by Swash

the Wii outsold the Xbox and PS3 because it was a family oriented system. Unlike the PS3 and the Xbox it is far from being a console for real gamers, Call of Duty is like the only game for real gamers on there. And also I think the WII has great graphics, but un-realistic. And also notice how the Game of the Year last year was a PS3 game and critics are saying that the Game of 2010 is an Xbox game.

Thank you for making my point although I would argue that the Wii was just more fun in terms of gameplay. However, like the Wii, POTCO is family oriented. And it is the ONLY reason POTCO works. Period. Since you are in charge of deciding what constitutes games and consoles for real gamers, please tell me where POTCO fits in. In my opinion, POTCO is for casual gamers and to try and hang "real gamer" attributes to it is just plain silly.

You are comparing Disney with companies whose only purpose is to make video games. For machines that exist only to play those video games. They all have the same abilities. Your X-Box is just like my X-Box and My PS3 is just like your PS3. It is easier to hit a target that isn't moving. My PC is NOTHING like your PC. How do the developers deal with this? By marketing something for the lowest common denominator.

POTCO is, first and foremost, an advertising gimmick. And Disney is WAY too big to care about it much. I guarantee, the day POTCO loses a single dime, it gets shut down forever.

This is about as "real gamer" (what does that even mean?) of a game as Farmville is. It just happens to appeal to a lot of people. Leave it alone. It works as it is.

Originally Posted by Swash

, I back up my argument of Disney having no excuse for taking so long on content with another example. Fallout 3 on PC was a great game and the Developers released an editing pack for it. Turns out the average person took maybe 5 hours from their day and made content better than the people who were PAYED to MAKE the game.

We agree on the intent if not the tone here. Disney has been WAY too slow in turning out content. But if Fallout 3 can be improved in 5 hours by some random Joe (who I can only assume was a "real gamer") who wasn't even PAID to do the job, then Fallout 3 must have been really, really bad.

[Benjamin Prowash]

I think numbers should be uncensored. It's just annoying to try telling someone I need to sink a certain amount of ships, and I can just do some others ways to tell someone my age. A favorite I've heard? " I'm a dozen minus won " Or problems among those lines. Stop censoring numbers, and our lives get easier as simple as won, too, tree, for, hive, sticks, sven!

[MacIronhawk]

Originally Posted by Swash

Lastly, I back up my argument of Disney having no excuse for taking so long on content with another example.

The reason all the new content is taking so long is because POTCO was released before POTBS so that POTCO could make more money. Whether that's helped them or not is beyond me, but changing islands, caves, and the inventory system should have been done during beta.

Their only other excuse is that their developing staff is less than 20 people.

[ex8404]

Originally Posted by MacIronhawk

The reason all the new content is taking so long is because POTCO was released before POTBS so that POTCO could make more money. Whether that's helped them or not is beyond me, but changing islands, caves, and the inventory system should have been done during beta.

Their only other excuse is that their developing staff is less than 20 people.

Not being contentious here or looking for an argument but just how has this little factoid become part of the POTCO lore?

Is it fact or conjecture? Truth is, for a while there I couldn't turn on my TV without seeing an ad for POTCO. I had never even heard of POTBS until I started posting here.

I would love to know the truth behind this and where it comes from.

[MacIronhawk]

Originally Posted by ex8404

Not being contentious here or looking for an argument but just how has this little factoid become part of the POTCO lore?

Is it fact or conjecture? Truth is, for a while there I couldn't turn on my TV without seeing an ad for POTCO. I had never even heard of POTBS until I started posting here.

I would love to know the truth behind this and where it comes from.

Sorry, I don't understand the first question.

I believe i'm one of the few people here... or maybe not, that was looking at POTBS and POTCO when they were both beginning. I wanted to see what game looked more fun. And then I started noticing a lot of talk on different forums, particulary POTBS forums, about which game would release first. Many people agreed POTCO would be released first, simply because Disney would think the game would make more money if they released before another pirates online game.

Whether the game was actually released just to be before POTBS or not remains to be seen. However, it would certainly make sense, considering the game has been redone in many areas(islands, inventory, caves) more than in any other game I've played.

Toontown hardly did any redoing once it was released. Changed fishing a bit, toontowncentral, and took out the merry-go-round in minnies melodyland.

Now, POTCO has redone 3 islands, ALL of the caves, and now redoing the inventory system. The new inventory system is certainly more user friendly, other than the fact that not all of our weapons will be at our disposal any time we want. What with the equpping you need to do.

Ok, I've been going on a bit too long. Anyways. if Disney actually cared about this game and its' content, these things would have been changed during beta. Simply put, it looks to me like they decided they need to release the game either in time to beat POTBS or in time with the second pirates movie.

EDIT: I agree with Swash's last post. I honestly wouldn't be posting this if the second story quest was out. I'd be in the game. But instead, I'm here hoping that the developers are reading our opinions. I'm bored of the game. Weapon griding is the majority of the game, and anytime I go on now it's for invasions and EITC fleets. Especially when I get to fight the "enemy" with the crew.

I just want to be playing a game where I feel like I'm accomplishing something. Without a story line I'm lost.

[Nate Swordwalker]

Originally Posted by MacIronhawk

Without a story line I'm lost.

I TOTALLY agree with you. The game has been starting to bore me, and it has taken control of me before. I stopped about a year after i had joined a week after the game came out. The game needs a new story line, because my two major pirates finished their BP Quest before they were lvl 28. The bbs are too easy and need some changing around. Most of the pirates these days are oldies and need some new stuff to mess around with.