|
|
|
|
|||||||
| Fixed Geek Squad Rescued These Threads |
|
Login or Register now to see less ads. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Actually, I'm just trying to explain why it is some of us would rather not see other players in game. Yeah, I suppose if you server hop constantly you could find an actual quiet server. I'm saying I preferred when they were easy to find, and you actually didn't run into other people.
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Yeah but my point is it's not that easy for some of us. Personally, in game, I have awful luck with servers thanks.
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
There are no "guild servers" and to say that cutting costs is a bad business move doesn't take into consideration that business is bad right now. But like so many other online games, the option to lease a server isn't a bad one. That way a guild could really have their own little sandbox to play in. Slouyx and Del are right. This really is non-issue. I just logged off. Out of 57 servers, 23 were ideal and none were full. That leaves 24 basically empty servers. 2 1/2 years ago, half the servers wouldn't be empty. Ever. Business is a little slow right now and keeping dead servers open and paying for the maintenance and electricity and upgrades makes less sense. But look at it this way. Faster, more streamlined updates are a real possibility, aren't they? Not to mention the loading times... |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
It is an issue though....
But yes, I am glad pirates can load faster. That's great! ![]() I hope they bring them back in the future for I liked it when some servers were really quiet. |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
If the reduction in servers means more money to spend on game content work, then I'm perfectly fine with that, but only IF that's what they're doing. Of course there's no way of knowing what they're doing with the extra money since they don't have to maintain those servers; we can only guess, really.
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
And are HALF the servers really gone? This isn't a dig or anything. I just don't have a feel for the number of servers they used to have, pre-Raven's Cove. |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
It's frightening that they even had to think about cutting servers off to save money. This is where I stop to think, "Should I keep paying for this game? If it dies, then the 80 bucks a year I spent went to what? The trash? If I'm going to pay and play a game, I want to KNOW that it will be there for a very long time. Why? Because, to me it's just a waste of money if I can't play the game when I paid for it. I buy a console game, and I have it forever. But with an online game, if the company messes up, I can't do anything about getting back on the game to play. It's gone, and trashing servers only makes me think they're losing money, and I don't want to be upset if the game dies, knowing I spent 360+ dollars. |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Can anyone answer this for me? Out of curiosity? How many servers were there before they thinned out the herd? No guesses. Anyone have the number? |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Just saying, I don't mind them removing a lot of the servers. It doesn't bother me, and I still find half the servers to be empty. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|