Clan Sub-forums a bit out of hand?

[The_Farmer]

That is a very well-put post you have there. I am sure the mods and admins will take it as a suggestion and idea rather than a complaint.

I have noticed the amount of clan sub-forums this site has, and it's quite a bit. Though maybe the sub-forums are inactive, I believe maybe they are active behind the scenes. Perhaps a non-member (non-forums member) has taken it over. Still, in that case we come to your well-stated conclusion. Some are inactive and there is a reason to not keep them there.

[Dukk19]

I'm still here...

[Jack I]

I know you're here, I'm not trying to point this towards all subforums. I've just noticed a few that I don't see how/why
they deserve a sub-forum as
1. The subforum is inactive
2. The guild is new
3. The guild doesn't follow sub-forum acceptance guidlelines. (Part of #2)

So, I'm just reffering to some that seem to be there just to attract extra attention to their guild. ^^

[Caleb Killagin]

Ahem.. So you say I dont deserve a subforum? 10 is fine, I just think that this may stop soon so that I ought to get a jump on it early. I figured that eventually.. the will no longer be accepting ones. But I have plenty of members in my guild that get on regularly. I agree though, those guilds with a limited access guildmaster (not slamming you -you know who you are-) and one without a guildmaster period (not slamming that awesome guild either!).

[Jack I]

I'm not saying you don't deserve one Caleb, I'm reffering to the sub-forum qualifications as posted by Batleth. Don't get me wrong, I'm not trying to offend anyone, but I'm just saying that I think it's best we start following the regulations posted a bit stricter.