|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
I ban Jack for not realizing that is what he is trying to do.
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
I ban Sharky, for he didn't mention that.
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
I ban you all because I am in a very pleasant mood....
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
I ban Jules because someone will ruin that soon.
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
I ban TSC for predicting his own doing.
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
I ban Skip for implying that I will ruin Jules' day.
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
I ban TSC because implication does not equal insinuation.
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
I ban Skip because TSC could never ruin my day!
|
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
I ban Jules for being right.
|
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
I ban TSC for not noticing Jules's clever wording. She said you could never ruin your day, not would. Therefore by agreeing, you basically said that you didn't have the power to do so.
Ahh, I love looking into the deeper meaning of these. I ban that too. |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
I ban DF because she says could because no matter what I could say or do; I'll never mess up her day. Besides she is Jules, I would never try to ruin her day. I can, but I won't.
|
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
I ban Davy for double banning when the second ban has no purpose
|
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
I ban Muffin because I don't know who that is.
|
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
I ban rich for showing ignorance in the ban game. That will one day be held against you.
|
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
I ban TSC because you never ruin my day no matter how hard you try
.
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|